13 June 2022
by Kate Iida
Data sharing can support research into reducing carbon emissions, and open data on greenhouse gas emissions can help hold companies accountable to their sustainability pledges. But there are also concerns about the tech sector’s own carbon emissions.
On September 9, 2020, I woke to an eerie, orange-tinted darkness. Flakes of ash blanketed the garden outside my northern California home. An hour away, residents saw the San Francisco skyline bathed in an apocalyptic orange glow, caused by the 500,000 acres of wildfire blazing across the state.
For days, my family and I had sheltered indoors, avoiding dangerous levels of smoke in the air. We were lucky not to receive evacuation orders, but we couldn’t help feeling that the dark sky was a sign of the impending climate crisis.
Experts say that keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees celsius, to avoid the worst effects of climate change, requires “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society.”
To do this, carbon emissions need to reach ‘net zero’ by 2050, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has said. Net zero essentially means “not adding to the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.”
Towards this goal, in April the UK Government announced a new target of cutting carbon emissions by 78% by 2035 as compared to 1990 levels, keeping the country on track to meet net zero by 2050.
But how can countries like the UK meet their net zero goals?
According to a report by Arup and the Open Data Institute, open data, including information about carbon emissions and energy use, can help reduce emissions and avoid the worst-case climate scenario.
The term ‘open data’, according to The World Bank, means “data or content […] that is free to use, re-use or redistribute.” Open data must have minimal to no legal restrictions on its use, and be published in machine readable formats that anyone can access and use with free software.
Sharing data with researchers can help support investigations into policies that reduce emissions, and requiring companies to openly publish data on their greenhouse gas emissions can also help hold companies accountable to their sustainability pledges. But there are also concerns about the carbon emissions caused by big data and the tech sector itself.
Data is already being shared with researchers to help them explore public policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. One team in the Data for Climate Action competition, for example, used data provided by WAZE, EPA MOVES-Mexico, and Google Places’ Popular Times on congestion in Mexico City to estimate the carbon emissions caused by traffic jams in the capital.
The team then determined that if Mexico City implemented a policy to make transit buses run on electric power, this would reduce CO2 emissions by about a quarter. The competition demonstrated how sharing data can provide a new and powerful resource for innovative public policy research, and in this case leads to a strong argument for electric powered public transport.
Open data in particular can have an important environmental benefit: it can help hold organisations accountable in keeping to their sustainability pledges.
On February 14th 2022, news broke that several large banks, including HSBC, Barclays and Deutsche Bank have invested billions of dollars in the expansion of oil and gas, despite promising to support the move to net zero as part of the Net Zero Banking Alliance.
This incident demonstrates a long running problem with private-sector net zero pledges: it’s hard to find out if companies actually follow their public commitments to reduce emissions, or to hold them accountable if they don’t. This is greenwashing – ‘the practice of businesses or investment funds making misleading or unsubstantiated claims about environmental performance’.
Requiring private companies to publicly share data about their carbon emissions and the environmental impact of the projects they’re funding will make it easier to track the sustainability changes made by the private sector. This, in turn, will help keep companies accountable in making progress towards their stated climate goals.
Costa Rica’s National System of Climate Change Metrics demonstrates the steps governments can take to make this happen. Their open data platform includes information on a wide range of drivers for climate change, risks and responses.
Gavin Starks, founder of the UK’s Icebreaker One initiative, has argued for automating the reporting of data on greenhouse gas emissions. This, he writes, could help countries ensure that they are on track to reach their net zero goals, ‘rather than waiting for the climate data to tell us that we’re not’.
Requiring private companies to publish data about their carbon emissions could also help to address one of the major concerns about using data and technology to support sustainability: the environmental impact of the tech sector itself.
Any solution to the climate crisis that looks to data and technology as an answer, however, must first address the tech sector’s environmental impacts.
In the report, Digital technology and the planet, The Royal Society recommends that the technology sector should be open about the impact of its activities on the climate. ‘The tech sector should lead by example and make data accessible’, The Royal Society proposes, ‘to allow the greater monitoring of its energy consumption and carbon emissions’.
Data centres – buildings which contain many powerful computers and the systems needed to keep them running so that large amounts of data can be processed – consume significant amounts of electricity.
The International Energy Agency says that data centres contribute 0.3% to global carbon dioxide emissions, and are responsible for 1% of the global demand for electricity.
Many data centres still run on fossil fuels. Atlas of AI author Kate Crawford writes that ‘China’s data centre industry draws 73 percent of its power from coal, emitting about 99 million tons of CO2 in 2018’.
And that doesn’t include other environmental impacts of technology, such as the pollution caused by mining for minerals like lithium, cobalt and the rare earth elements used in batteries, mobile phones and laptops.
Researchers are working to find ways to make data centres more sustainable, such as building them in cool climates or using water cooling systems that use less energy to keep the centres at appropriate temperatures. Others, such as the Condorcet data centre in Paris and and IBM data centre in Switzerland, use waste heat produced by the centres as a power source for nearby areas. Facebook, Google and Apple, furthermore, have all made commitments to use entirely renewable energy.
But, as The Royal Society expresses, to meet net zero ‘the tech sector will need to achieve actual zero emissions’. That’s still a long way off.
Yes, open data can help to support initiatives to reduce carbon emissions and hold companies accountable to their sustainability commitments. Investing in more data and data processing capabilities, however, needs to be measured against its environmental impacts.
Above all, researchers and organisations need to honestly evaluate ‘whether specific data and computing applications bring environmental or social benefits that outweigh their own emissions’.
If we’re to stop or reverse environmental damage like the California wildfires, companies around the world need to follow through on their sustainability commitments. More shared and open data arguably won’t solve the climate crisis on its own, but it can help the cause.