20 June 2023

 Unlocking the economic potential of AI: Tajikistan’s plans to become more AI-ready

By Annys Rogerson

The government of the Republic of Tajikistan has set the goal that 1% of its GDP will come from AI-related economic activity by 2026. This is an ambitious goal as Tajikistan is predominantly a primary sector economy, with agriculture responsible for 60% of employment. However, as the country begins to industrialise, its policymakers are looking one step further, towards AI. Why? Azizjon Azimi, Head of Tajikistan’s AI Council and founder of startup zypl.ai, suggests that supporting AI development in the country will help Tajikistan avoid the middle income trap, where a country progresses to middle income status but fails to transition to a higher income economy. Therefore, while the Ministry of Industry and New Technologies focuses on supporting industrialisation, the recently formed AI Council is working to demonstrate how AI can contribute to the country’s long term development.

Demonstrating AI Use Cases

At this first stage, the AI Council has prioritised demonstrating why AI is something the Tajik population and its government should care about. This means showing how AI can be deployed usefully right now. To do so, the AI Council has been working with public and private partners to find and test use cases across several sectors of the economy. These include:


AI is now used to underwrite 1 ⁄ 4 of all loans in the country, as a result of 8 financial institutions adopting software developed by the Tajik startup zypl.ai.

Now, the National Bank of Tajikistan is looking to progress digital banking applications further by using AI for remote identification. The aim is to increase the number of people who can apply for loans or open bank accounts among those who are not able to attend a bank in person.


AI is now supporting career counselling for high school students in Tajikistan. For the first time this Summer, students will complete a questionnaire as part of a national exam at the end of high school and their answers will be fed into an AI algorithm that provides career recommendations. This project is part of a collaboration between UNICEF, the NGO TajRupt, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Labor, and the AI Council and will be rolled out at the national scale.

Another collaborator with the government is the UNDP, who recently co-delivered the ‘Upskill 1.0 project’ for University teachers. This saw 50 university professors complete a one-year programme on ML teaching.

A third project within education is piloting the use of facial recognition technologies as an alternative to access cards or fobs to enter school buildings. The project is currently being piloted in 3 schools. The government has worked with their private partner to protect student privacy by ensuring both that the ML algorithm is run locally within the school, and the servers store the data internally.


In the telecoms industry, companies are using AI to predict which of their customers are likely to switch providers and increase customer retention. Significant competition in the industry has led to a high number of customers switching providers, posing a challenge to telecom companies. In response, two major telecom companies built AI models in-house with talent from the AI Council’s AI Academy. The companies are now using these models to predict customer churn and offer bonuses to customers with a high likelihood of switching providers.

The role of government

The government has been an important player in getting these use cases off the ground; either as a buyer or builder of AI. The government’s involvement in each of the cases was guided by its national AI strategy, officially approved in 2022 with the support of Mr Sherali Kabir, Minister of Industry and new technologies, and the efforts of the AI Council.

Beyond demonstrating current use cases of AI, the government is working to create the conditions for AI companies to grow in the country. Their work appears to centre around two aims (1) encouraging companies to set up in Tajikistan by defining their competitive advantage in AI and (2) adapting the legislative and regulatory frameworks so that AI applications can scale and be deployed responsibly.

1. Defining Tajikistan’s competitive advantage

Since economic activity is largely not digitised in Tajikistan, companies lack the data needed to build AI. However, Azizjon Azimi thinks they’ve found a route around that problem; synthetic data. Synthetic data is data generated using a sample of real data and a model trained to produce more data with the same characteristics and structure of the sample. This technique gives teams a route for generating more, usable data based on a small sample. Therefore, Azizjon Azimi suggests that synthetic data makes it possible to build models faster, without the need to first take more basic digitisation steps.

Synthetic data is at the core of many of the AI projects in Tajikistan, and the country’s AI Academy is focused on upskilling students in how to use this technique. The bigger aspiration is for models to be piloted in Tajikistan, proved useful, and then be shipped abroad and scaled using real data. Azizjon Azimi suggests that, in this sense, we can think of Tajikistan as the “sandbox capital of the world”.

 2. Legislative and regulatory reform

The AI Council is working to create a more start-up-friendly legislative environment by setting the basic preconditions for startups to set up and grow. This includes encouraging the government to pass venture capital legislation to enable Tajik startups to raise capital in the country. Azizjon Azimi points out that, currently, this is not possible. A company looking to raise VC has to open an entity abroad and raise money there before bringing the capital to Tajikistan.

In Tajikistan, regulations around AI are the responsibility of existing sector regulators. Azizjon Azimi notes that the government is choosing not to create a new regulatory body for AI in order to avoid over-bureaucratising the sector. As things stand, an organisation looking to develop an AI application submits a proposal to the relevant sector regulator, who then has the remit to accept or deny the proposal. While excessive bureaucracy is a worthy concern and a sector-based regulatory approach may be appropriate, the approach needs to be accompanied by proper training and guidance for existing regulators who may not be familiar with the unique risks of AI. One way to do this could be for the AI Council to play a coordinating role in upskilling regulators.

In addition, since there is no AI-specific regulation, approval of projects is left to the judgement of regulators. Without formal regulations or mandatory guidance, citizens cannot be reassured that only responsible uses of AI are approved and must rely on the regulator to make the right call in each case. Take the example of deploying facial recognition in schools. It is positive to see that the government took action to ensure the protection and privacy of student data. However, citizens need certainty that, firstly, these concerns will be addressed in all cases, and secondly, other concerns will be considered too, such as whether facial recognition could disadvantage some students if the algorithm does not have a high enough accuracy for all groups in the population. It would be positive to see upcoming legislation on AI, the timetable for which is laid out in the national AI strategy, addressing the need for standardised regulations or guidance across regulators.

Supporting regional growth

Another key part of the AI Council’s work is driving regional coordination on AI. In the Government AI Readiness Index, Tajikistan is behind in the region in terms of the maturity of its technology sector. However, Tajik startup zypl.ai’s recent win at a regional Google Accelerator competition and the company’s expansion into Kazakhstan and the MENA region has shown the country’s ability to produce competitive companies. The company’s expansion also demonstrates that the benefits of AI development are reaped by the whole region.

With this in mind, Tajikistan’s AI Council and their peers in neighbouring countries are working on a common document to harmonise regulations and principles on AI, including an approach to AI ethics, across the region. Once the document has been agreed at this level, the next steps are for it to gain ministerial approval and, lastly, to be agreed by the C5, a government forum of 5 central asian countries (Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan).

This coordination is expected to promote investment and allow AI workers to move between countries. It offers an important study for other regions looking to understand the benefits of coordination, and could be a useful demonstration of the power of forums like the C5 to take impactful measures. Looking ahead, this coordination provides an important opportunity for supporting more success stories of using AI to serve the needs of people in the region.


Should we be interviewing you next? Contact us at  research@oxfordinsights.com


More insights

21 April 2017

Why Government is ready for AI

12 July 2017

Five levels of AI in public service

26 July 2017

Making it personal: civil service and morality

10 August 2017

AI: Is a robot assistant going to steal your job?

19 September 2017

AI and legitimacy: government in the age of the machine

06 October 2017

More Than The Trees Are Worth? Intangibles, Decision-Making, and the Meares Island Logging Conflict

16 October 2017

The UK Government’s AI review: what’s missing?

23 October 2017

Why unconference? #Reimagine2017

03 November 2017

AI: the ultimate intern

09 November 2017

Motherboard knows best?

23 November 2017

Beyond driverless cars: our take on the UK’s Autumn Budget 2017

05 December 2017

Why Black people don’t start businesses (and how more inclusive innovation could make a difference)

06 December 2017

“The things that make me interesting cannot be digitised”: leadership lessons from the Drucker Forum

23 January 2018

Want to get serious about artificial intelligence? You’ll need an AI strategy

15 February 2018

Economic disruption and runaway AI: what can governments do?

26 April 2018

Ranking governments on AI – it’s time to act

08 May 2018

AI in the UK: are we ‘ready, willing and able’?

24 May 2018

Mexico leads Latin America as one of the first ten countries in the world to launch an artificial intelligence strategy

05 July 2018

Beyond borders: talking at TEDxLondon

13 July 2018

Is the UK ready, willing and able for AI? The Government responds to the Lords’ report

17 July 2018

Suspending or shaping the AI policy frontier: has Germany become part of the AI strategy fallacy?

27 July 2018

From open data to artificial intelligence: the next frontier in anti-corruption

01 August 2018

Why every city needs to take action on AI

09 August 2018

When good intentions go bad: the role of technology in terrorist content online

26 September 2018

Actions speak louder than words: the role of technology in combating terrorist content online

08 February 2019

More than STEM: how teaching human specialties will help prepare kids for AI

02 May 2019

Should we be scared of artificial intelligence?

04 June 2019

Ethics and AI: a crash course

25 July 2019

Dear Boris

01 August 2019

AI: more than human?

06 August 2019

Towards Synthetic Reality: When DeepFakes meet AR/VR

19 September 2019

Predictive Analytics, Public Services and Poverty

10 January 2020

To tackle regional inequality, AI strategies need to go local

20 April 2020

Workshops in an age of COVID and lockdown

10 September 2020

Will automation accelerate what coronavirus started?

10 September 2020

Promoting gender equality and social inclusion through public procurement

21 September 2020

The Social Dilemma: A failed attempt to land a punch on Big Tech

20 October 2020

Data and Power: AI and Development in the Global South

23 December 2020

The ‘Creepiness Test’: When should we worry that AI is making decisions for us?

13 June 2022

Data promises to support climate action. Is it a double-edged sword?

30 September 2022

Towards a human-centred vision for public services: Human-Centred Public Services Index

06 October 2022

Why You Should Know and Care About Algorithmic Transparency

26 October 2022

Harnessing data for the public good: What can governments do?

09 December 2022

Behind the scenes of the Government AI Readiness Index

06 February 2023

Reflections on the Intel® AI for Youth Program

01 May 2023

Canada’s AI Policy: Leading the way in ethics, innovation, and talent

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Giulia, Consultant

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Emma, Consultant

17 May 2023

Day in the life series: Kirsty, Head of Programmes

18 May 2023

Day in the life series: Sully, Partnerships Associate/Consultant

19 May 2023

LLMs in Government: Brainstorming Applications

23 May 2023

Bahrain: Becoming a regional R&D Hub

30 May 2023

Driving AI adoption in the public sector: Uruguay’s efforts on capacity-building, trust, and AI ethics

07 June 2023

Jordan’s AI policy journey: Bridging vision and implementation

12 June 2023

Response to the UK’s Global Summit on AI Safety

11 July 2023

Government transparency and anti-corruption standards: Reflections from the EITI Global Conference in Dakar, Senegal

31 August 2023

What is quantum technology and why should policymakers care about it?

21 September 2023

Practical tools for designers in government looking to avoid ethical AI nightmares

23 October 2023

Collective Intelligence: exploring ‘wicked problems’ in National Security

23 October 2023

Exploring the concepts of digital twin, digital shadow, and digital model

30 October 2023

How to hire privileged white men

09 November 2023

Inclusive consensus building: Reflections from day 4 of AI Fringe

13 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Can AI help us improve our home’s energy efficiency?

14 November 2023

Navigating the AI summit boom: Initial reflections

20 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Improving home energy efficiency by retrofitting

24 November 2023

Will AI kill us all?

27 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Preventing and predicting wildfires 

28 November 2023

Service Design in Government 2023: conference reflections

04 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Using artificial and indigenous Intelligence to fight climate change

06 December 2023

Release: 2023 Government AI Readiness Index reveals which governments are most prepared to use AI

11 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: AI for flood adaptation plans and disaster relief

18 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Managing floods using AI Early Warning Systems

28 May 2024

Strengthening AI Governance in Chile: GobLab UAI and the Importance of Collaboration

05 June 2024

Towards a Digital Society: Trinidad and Tobago’s AI Ambitions

17 June 2024

General election 2024 manifestos: the AI, data and digital TLDR

26 June 2024

Building Egypt’s AI Future: Capacity-Building, Compute Infrastructure, and Domestic LLMs

16 July 2024

Beyond the hype: thoughts on digital, data, and AI and the first 100 days