27 July 2018

From open data to artificial intelligence: the next frontier in anti-corruption

By André Petheram and Isak Nti Asare

Author note: We wrote a research report based on some of the ideas in this blog. You can find it here.

In the fight against corruption, authorities need every tool they can find. It is an expensive crime, with an estimated US$1.5 to $2 trillion lost each year to bribes globally. The problem is consistently difficult to solve, with most countries showing little improvement in Transparency International’s latest Corruption Perceptions Index.

However, thanks to the sustained efforts of civil society, governments, and businesses as part of the open data movement across the world, it is getting easier to see how governments spend their money. Open information about government contracts with private companies, a common source of corruption, is now consistently available in many countries. Ukraine’s innovative ProZorro portal, for example, helps anti-corruption bodies spot tenders designed to favour particular bidders.

Governments themselves are playing an important role in working out which data is needed to combat corruption, with Mexico’s implementation of the Open Data Charter’s Anticorruption Open Up Guide leading the way. Moreover, as more of this data is opened, data mining has an increasingly important role. This underpins research projects such as the pan-European Digiwhist, which analyses millions of EU government contracts to identify those particularly vulnerable to abuse.



The natural next step is to explore the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to find insights and anomalies within big and open datasets. We think AI will have three main benefits in fighting corruption.

First, artificial intelligence can reveal patterns too complex for humans to see without mechanical assistance. In 2017, for example, Spanish researchers Félix López-Iturriaga and Iván Pastor Sanz used neural networks to build a predictive model for corruption in Spanish provinces. This algorithm identified a previously unseen relationship between particular economic factors, such as rising real estate prices, and corruption cases. The model can identify corruption before it emerges, potentially allowing authorities to take pre-emptive measures. The next challenge will be to train algorithms on yet more complex and diverse datasets in a search for deeply hidden corruption indicators. Moreover, researchers and developers must begin co-designing their tools with authorities, so that these innovations can be put to immediate use in everyday anti-corruption work.

Secondly, AI’s ability to process large amounts of data allows people to focus on details. Anti-corruption analysis is labour-intensive. As more and more data becomes available to anti-corruption organisations, it becomes harder to work through it all. Artificial intelligence programmes can act like inexpensive analysts for teams that are often poorly-funded, and can work in real-time. In the related field of fraud detection, for example, Citibank has invested in a machine learning platform that flags suspect transactions as they occur. If artificial intelligence can be used to enhance, deepen and accelerate routine data analysis, then people can be freed to scrutinise suspicious contracts or payments in depth. This can increase the rate of corruption prosecutions.

Finally, you can’t threaten an algorithm. Anti-corruption activists’ bravery and endeavour has often been the most important factor in holding governments to account and forcing the prosecution of corrupt individuals. However, if authorities and activists increasingly use artificial intelligence, this will mean that less anti-corruption activity is vulnerable to violence and legal pressure. Algorithms can largely churn away no matter what is going on externally. This effect could be intensified by ensuring that any anti-corruption AI tool is overseen by people far away from the targets of surveillance.

Governments, NGOs and law enforcement agencies are not AI ready when it comes to anti-corruption. The number of researchers working in the field is small. Most crucially, developers and anti-corruption bodies must develop a rigorous understanding of which datasets can most help AI practitioners: for example, is it more useful to look at government spending, or to access the financial accounts of suspected individuals? Oxford Insights will begin research into this question in the coming weeks, and we would welcome any thoughts and suggestions that are out there.

Artificial intelligence has the potential to recapture millions, and possibly billions, of dollars for governments and therefore citizens across the world. However, the work required is yet to begin in earnest.

For more information about Oxford Insights’ anti-corruption work, please contact us.


More insights

21 April 2017

Why Government is ready for AI

12 July 2017

Five levels of AI in public service

26 July 2017

Making it personal: civil service and morality

10 August 2017

AI: Is a robot assistant going to steal your job?

19 September 2017

AI and legitimacy: government in the age of the machine

06 October 2017

More Than The Trees Are Worth? Intangibles, Decision-Making, and the Meares Island Logging Conflict

16 October 2017

The UK Government’s AI review: what’s missing?

23 October 2017

Why unconference? #Reimagine2017

03 November 2017

AI: the ultimate intern

09 November 2017

Motherboard knows best?

23 November 2017

Beyond driverless cars: our take on the UK’s Autumn Budget 2017

05 December 2017

Why Black people don’t start businesses (and how more inclusive innovation could make a difference)

06 December 2017

“The things that make me interesting cannot be digitised”: leadership lessons from the Drucker Forum

23 January 2018

Want to get serious about artificial intelligence? You’ll need an AI strategy

15 February 2018

Economic disruption and runaway AI: what can governments do?

26 April 2018

Ranking governments on AI – it’s time to act

08 May 2018

AI in the UK: are we ‘ready, willing and able’?

24 May 2018

Mexico leads Latin America as one of the first ten countries in the world to launch an artificial intelligence strategy

05 July 2018

Beyond borders: talking at TEDxLondon

13 July 2018

Is the UK ready, willing and able for AI? The Government responds to the Lords’ report

17 July 2018

Suspending or shaping the AI policy frontier: has Germany become part of the AI strategy fallacy?

01 August 2018

Why every city needs to take action on AI

09 August 2018

When good intentions go bad: the role of technology in terrorist content online

26 September 2018

Actions speak louder than words: the role of technology in combating terrorist content online

08 February 2019

More than STEM: how teaching human specialties will help prepare kids for AI

02 May 2019

Should we be scared of artificial intelligence?

04 June 2019

Ethics and AI: a crash course

25 July 2019

Dear Boris

01 August 2019

AI: more than human?

06 August 2019

Towards Synthetic Reality: When DeepFakes meet AR/VR

19 September 2019

Predictive Analytics, Public Services and Poverty

10 January 2020

To tackle regional inequality, AI strategies need to go local

20 April 2020

Workshops in an age of COVID and lockdown

10 September 2020

Will automation accelerate what coronavirus started?

10 September 2020

Promoting gender equality and social inclusion through public procurement

21 September 2020

The Social Dilemma: A failed attempt to land a punch on Big Tech

20 October 2020

Data and Power: AI and Development in the Global South

23 December 2020

The ‘Creepiness Test’: When should we worry that AI is making decisions for us?

13 June 2022

Data promises to support climate action. Is it a double-edged sword?

30 September 2022

Towards a human-centred vision for public services: Human-Centred Public Services Index

06 October 2022

Why You Should Know and Care About Algorithmic Transparency

26 October 2022

Harnessing data for the public good: What can governments do?

09 December 2022

Behind the scenes of the Government AI Readiness Index

06 February 2023

Reflections on the Intel® AI for Youth Program

01 May 2023

Canada’s AI Policy: Leading the way in ethics, innovation, and talent

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Giulia, Consultant

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Emma, Consultant

17 May 2023

Day in the life series: Kirsty, Head of Programmes

18 May 2023

Day in the life series: Sully, Partnerships Associate/Consultant

19 May 2023

LLMs in Government: Brainstorming Applications

23 May 2023

Bahrain: Becoming a regional R&D Hub

30 May 2023

Driving AI adoption in the public sector: Uruguay’s efforts on capacity-building, trust, and AI ethics

07 June 2023

Jordan’s AI policy journey: Bridging vision and implementation

12 June 2023

Response to the UK’s Global Summit on AI Safety

20 June 2023

 Unlocking the economic potential of AI: Tajikistan’s plans to become more AI-ready

11 July 2023

Government transparency and anti-corruption standards: Reflections from the EITI Global Conference in Dakar, Senegal

31 August 2023

What is quantum technology and why should policymakers care about it?

21 September 2023

Practical tools for designers in government looking to avoid ethical AI nightmares

23 October 2023

Collective Intelligence: exploring ‘wicked problems’ in National Security

23 October 2023

Exploring the concepts of digital twin, digital shadow, and digital model

30 October 2023

How to hire privileged white men

09 November 2023

Inclusive consensus building: Reflections from day 4 of AI Fringe

13 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Can AI help us improve our home’s energy efficiency?

14 November 2023

Navigating the AI summit boom: Initial reflections

20 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Improving home energy efficiency by retrofitting

24 November 2023

Will AI kill us all?

27 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Preventing and predicting wildfires 

28 November 2023

Service Design in Government 2023: conference reflections

04 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Using artificial and indigenous Intelligence to fight climate change

06 December 2023

Release: 2023 Government AI Readiness Index reveals which governments are most prepared to use AI

11 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: AI for flood adaptation plans and disaster relief

18 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Managing floods using AI Early Warning Systems

28 May 2024

Strengthening AI Governance in Chile: GobLab UAI and the Importance of Collaboration

05 June 2024

Towards a Digital Society: Trinidad and Tobago’s AI Ambitions

17 June 2024

General election 2024 manifestos: the AI, data and digital TLDR

26 June 2024

Building Egypt’s AI Future: Capacity-Building, Compute Infrastructure, and Domestic LLMs

16 July 2024

Beyond the hype: thoughts on digital, data, and AI and the first 100 days