11 July 2023

Government transparency and anti-corruption standards: Reflections from the EITI Global Conference in Dakar, Senegal

by Kate Iida

The entrance to the EITI Global Conference in Dakar. Photo by Horlane Mbayo.

A few weeks ago, at nearly 10 p.m., my plane touched down in Dakar, Senegal. My colleague Horlane and I had arrived in West Africa for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Global Conference, held only once every three years.

The EITI is the main organisation working globally to counter corruption in the oil, gas, and mining sectors. At the event, government officials from around the world came to meet with journalists, researchers, and anti-corruption advocates to discuss how to tackle widespread problems of corruption. We were there to learn about how to make anti-corruption reforms work better in practice.

One of the main strengths of the EITI lies in the organisation’s standard, which requires governments to strengthen a broad range of transparency and accountability mechanisms in the extractive sector. The standard is currently being implemented by over fifty countries around the world.

At the conference, sessions covered the complexities of advocating for transparency in a landscape of conflicting interests, including the powerful interests of companies who want to extract resources in a certain area, governments who want to encourage economic growth, and local communities who want their concerns addressed. One powerful statement came from the Hon. Awa Marie Coll-Seck, the Minister of State and Chair of the EITI National Committee in Senegal, who argued for the importance of including women and local communities into discussions about potential extractives projects, advocating for their voices to be better heard.

Other conversations at the conference centred around Beneficial Ownership Transparency, one of the reforms required in the EITI’s 2023 standard. To implement this requirement, countries must set up a publicly available register with information about the people who ultimately benefit from the work conducted by extractives companies.

These benefits can come in the form of salaries, but also shares in the company, other types of benefits, and decision-making power. The register must include enough information about the identities of these beneficial owners so that the people using the register can determine who they are. Names alone are often not enough.

According to Open Ownership, an organisation which advocates for beneficial ownership transparency, the reform has multiple benefits. It can help, for example, to reduce the incidence of shell companies, which exist only on paper but have no real operations of employees. These types of companies are often used for money laundering. According to the World Bank, 70% of grand corruption cases have involved the use of shell companies with anonymous owners.

Beneficial ownership transparency could also help in clamping down on corruption in the extractives sector. Having high quality beneficial ownership information available in public registers also makes it easier for investigative journalists, advocacy organisations and law enforcement to quickly see whether a person with political power is a beneficial owner of an extractives company, and how that might influence their decisions.

Beneficial ownership transparency is a fast growing reform. So far, over 30 countries have implemented public beneficial ownership registers, including the UK, Greenland, Ecuador, Sweden, and Ghana. Other countries including Canada, Mexico, Australia, Spain and Morocco have made commitments to build public registries, but have not developed them yet.

There are still, however, problems with the implementation of the reform around the world. Countries struggle to publish data which aligns with Open Ownership’s principles, which cover the disclosure, collection, storage, auditability, quality and reliability of data. As an example, though multiple countries around the world, including the U.S., have made commitments to develop beneficial ownership registries, they have not committed to making that information publicly available.

Though creating a register is an important first step, addressing these problems is also an essential part of effectively implemented beneficial ownership transparency reform. The public needs access to high quality and usable data on the beneficial owners of extractives companies. How else can journalists, researchers and anti-corruption advocates hold governments accountable?

Insights

More insights

12 July 2017

Five levels of AI in public service

27 July 2018

From open data to artificial intelligence: the next frontier in anti-corruption

04 June 2019

Ethics and AI: a crash course

10 January 2020

To tackle regional inequality, AI strategies need to go local

23 December 2020

The ‘Creepiness Test’: When should we worry that AI is making decisions for us?

13 June 2022

Data promises to support climate action. Is it a double-edged sword?

30 September 2022

Towards a human-centred vision for public services: Human-Centred Public Services Index

06 October 2022

Why You Should Know and Care About Algorithmic Transparency

26 October 2022

Harnessing data for the public good: What can governments do?

09 December 2022

Behind the scenes of the Government AI Readiness Index

06 February 2023

Reflections on the Intel® AI for Youth Program

01 May 2023

Canada’s AI Policy: Leading the way in ethics, innovation, and talent

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Giulia, Consultant

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Emma, Consultant

17 May 2023

Day in the life series: Kirsty, Head of Programmes

18 May 2023

Day in the life series: Sully, Partnerships Associate/Consultant

19 May 2023

LLMs in Government: Brainstorming Applications

23 May 2023

Bahrain: Becoming a regional R&D Hub

30 May 2023

Driving AI adoption in the public sector: Uruguay’s efforts on capacity-building, trust, and AI ethics

07 June 2023

Jordan’s AI policy journey: Bridging vision and implementation

12 June 2023

Response to the UK’s Global Summit on AI Safety

20 June 2023

 Unlocking the economic potential of AI: Tajikistan’s plans to become more AI-ready

31 August 2023

What is quantum technology and why should policymakers care about it?

21 September 2023

Practical tools for designers in government looking to avoid ethical AI nightmares

23 October 2023

Collective Intelligence: exploring ‘wicked problems’ in National Security

23 October 2023

Exploring the concepts of digital twin, digital shadow, and digital model

30 October 2023

How to hire privileged white men

09 November 2023

Inclusive consensus building: Reflections from day 4 of AI Fringe

13 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Can AI help us improve our home’s energy efficiency?

14 November 2023

Navigating the AI summit boom: Initial reflections

20 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Improving home energy efficiency by retrofitting

24 November 2023

Will AI kill us all?

27 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Preventing and predicting wildfires 

28 November 2023

Service Design in Government 2023: conference reflections

04 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Using artificial and indigenous Intelligence to fight climate change

06 December 2023

Release: 2023 Government AI Readiness Index reveals which governments are most prepared to use AI

11 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: AI for flood adaptation plans and disaster relief

18 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Managing floods using AI Early Warning Systems