07 June 2023

Jordan’s AI policy journey: Bridging vision and implementation

By Annys Rogerson

Jordan is at a turning point. The Jordanian Government established a dedicated AI division within its Ministry of Digital Economy and Entrepreneurship (MoDEE) in 2020, headed by Lama Arabiat (Eng). Since then, the division has been focused on developing its National AI Strategy and AI Ethics Charter, both of which were published in 2022. Now, the division is turning towards the implementation of its plans and is looking towards the challenges involved in doing so.

Developing Jordan’s vision for AI

Jordan took a collaborative approach to the development of both its national strategy and ethics principles, involving representatives from across government, the private sector, academia and NGOs. Jordan took this approach to ensure that both documents were tailored to the needs of Jordanian society, public sector, and businesses, and so that its plans were achievable for the country’s AI community. The collaboration culminated in the national strategy that lays out a roadmap for the next 5 years. The strategy includes 5 main strategic objectives:

Within the roadmap, the government commits to an ambitious 68 projects, across 12 priority sectors. These projects will be coordinated by MoDEE’s AI division and delivered through collaboration between public, private, academic, and NGO partners.

Notably, only 35% of countries who have a National AI strategy have also adopted a set of national AI Ethics Principles. Within Jordan’s income group, the proportion of countries with ethics principles drops to 10%. Jordan chose to develop a National AI Ethics Charter concurrently with its strategy so that its burgeoning AI community would have a set of basic principles to form around. Given that ethics principles at a country-level are more common within country’s who are further along in AI adoption, Jordan’s early development of principles serves as a trial for the impact of ethics principles on nascent AI communities. The outcomes of this trial will depend on the adoption of the ethics principles by the community, which is now a focus for the MoDEE’s AI division as it begins implementing its vision.

Implementing Jordan’s vision for AI

National AI Strategy

As a first step towards implementing Jordan’s National AI Strategy, the MoDEE carried out AI readiness assessments on its governmental institutions. The assessments were done on 18 governmental institutions and came up with a gap analysis and recommendations for each entity in addition to an institutional 5-year action plan for adopting AI. The analysis found that the MoDEE was the most ‘AI ready’ agency and data quality was identified as an area for improvement across government. A secondary aim for this project was to raise awareness of AI among public sector workers. Lama Arabiat said that assessors recorded a 25% increase in awareness of AI among staff and over 3000 staff members attended the capacity building AI workshops involved. She suggested that the buy-in for AI adoption among agencies as a result of the assessments will be a key enabler for them in the years to come.

Promisingly, Jordan is now taking a cross-government approach to improving data quality, with MoDEE being responsible for creating a central, ‘national information system’ that collects data from several government entities. This is a crucial initiative for the adoption of AI in the public sector because, in many cases, AI systems will require data from a range of entities that needs to be structured according to the same standards. As well as putting standards in place for data quality, these efforts should be accompanied by strong data governance practices so that citizen’s data is not shared or used without explanation, consent, and mechanisms for redress.

The AI readiness assessments have also helped the government with the next stages of implementation, delivering their 68 projects, by identifying opportunities for adopting AI in the public sector. Jordan has started a pilot project to deploy AI to reduce traffic congestion. This project is led by MoDEE in collaboration with public, private, and academia partners. Currently, the team is at the early stages of piloting the project in a small geographic area in order to create a proof of concept they can scale up.

National AI Ethics Charter

Implementing principles of ethical AI within a country is less well-trodden ground. There is a danger that a government creates commendable principles of ethical AI but there is limited adoption of those principles within the country’s AI community. Jordan is now facing the task of avoiding this danger.

Jordan’s Ethical AI Charter is intended as a guideline for developing and using AI in Jordan and it is not binding on any groups. For now, the government’s approach is to encourage the adoption of its ethical principles among the AI community through:

Importantly, the Charter fits into the government’s broader efforts to support responsible use of digital technologies in Jordan. This work includes developing cybersecurity and data protection and privacy legislation, which will be binding. Lama suggests AI-specific legislation could be adopted later down the line and that the principles are a useful step towards understanding what this legislation would look like. For example, reports of violations of the principles could point to where legislative constraints are needed.

Ensuring progress

As Jordan embarks on its 5-year plan for supporting AI development, monitoring and evaluating progress will become crucial. The responsibility for monitoring progress, Lama Arabiat comments, will be with MoDEE and the AI division. In order to maintain citizens’ and industry’s confidence in the government, it is important that this monitoring is done openly. Openness is needed for citizens to continue to trust the government’s use of AI and industry professionals require the certainty that investments are being made as promised. Efforts to encourage openness include publishing progress on the strategy’s key metrics and adopting mechanisms that support transparency of AI use in the public sector.

More generally, when we monitor progress of government AI projects, we should recognise that using an AI system may not end up as the best solution to a problem. Governments can hugely improve public services through using data more effectively without the use of AI techniques and this should not be considered a failing. Therefore, project teams should remain open to solutions that do not involve AI. This should be recognised when Jordan monitors the progress of their own projects.

  Finally, as Jordan progresses with its projects, the government will itself be grappling with the challenge of putting its ethics principles into practice. This is an opportunity for the government to support the adoption of the principles outside of government too. Understanding best practice from its own experience will help the government to communicate to industry how to comply with its Ethics Charter. Consequently, the government can share its learnings through its awareness raising initiatives and feed its learnings into how it evaluates compliance within the AI community.


Should we be interviewing you next? Contact us at  research@oxfordinsights.com


More insights

21 April 2017

Why Government is ready for AI

12 July 2017

Five levels of AI in public service

26 July 2017

Making it personal: civil service and morality

10 August 2017

AI: Is a robot assistant going to steal your job?

19 September 2017

AI and legitimacy: government in the age of the machine

06 October 2017

More Than The Trees Are Worth? Intangibles, Decision-Making, and the Meares Island Logging Conflict

16 October 2017

The UK Government’s AI review: what’s missing?

23 October 2017

Why unconference? #Reimagine2017

03 November 2017

AI: the ultimate intern

09 November 2017

Motherboard knows best?

23 November 2017

Beyond driverless cars: our take on the UK’s Autumn Budget 2017

05 December 2017

Why Black people don’t start businesses (and how more inclusive innovation could make a difference)

06 December 2017

“The things that make me interesting cannot be digitised”: leadership lessons from the Drucker Forum

23 January 2018

Want to get serious about artificial intelligence? You’ll need an AI strategy

15 February 2018

Economic disruption and runaway AI: what can governments do?

26 April 2018

Ranking governments on AI – it’s time to act

08 May 2018

AI in the UK: are we ‘ready, willing and able’?

24 May 2018

Mexico leads Latin America as one of the first ten countries in the world to launch an artificial intelligence strategy

05 July 2018

Beyond borders: talking at TEDxLondon

13 July 2018

Is the UK ready, willing and able for AI? The Government responds to the Lords’ report

17 July 2018

Suspending or shaping the AI policy frontier: has Germany become part of the AI strategy fallacy?

27 July 2018

From open data to artificial intelligence: the next frontier in anti-corruption

01 August 2018

Why every city needs to take action on AI

09 August 2018

When good intentions go bad: the role of technology in terrorist content online

26 September 2018

Actions speak louder than words: the role of technology in combating terrorist content online

08 February 2019

More than STEM: how teaching human specialties will help prepare kids for AI

02 May 2019

Should we be scared of artificial intelligence?

04 June 2019

Ethics and AI: a crash course

25 July 2019

Dear Boris

01 August 2019

AI: more than human?

06 August 2019

Towards Synthetic Reality: When DeepFakes meet AR/VR

19 September 2019

Predictive Analytics, Public Services and Poverty

10 January 2020

To tackle regional inequality, AI strategies need to go local

20 April 2020

Workshops in an age of COVID and lockdown

10 September 2020

Will automation accelerate what coronavirus started?

10 September 2020

Promoting gender equality and social inclusion through public procurement

21 September 2020

The Social Dilemma: A failed attempt to land a punch on Big Tech

20 October 2020

Data and Power: AI and Development in the Global South

23 December 2020

The ‘Creepiness Test’: When should we worry that AI is making decisions for us?

13 June 2022

Data promises to support climate action. Is it a double-edged sword?

30 September 2022

Towards a human-centred vision for public services: Human-Centred Public Services Index

06 October 2022

Why You Should Know and Care About Algorithmic Transparency

26 October 2022

Harnessing data for the public good: What can governments do?

09 December 2022

Behind the scenes of the Government AI Readiness Index

06 February 2023

Reflections on the Intel® AI for Youth Program

01 May 2023

Canada’s AI Policy: Leading the way in ethics, innovation, and talent

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Giulia, Consultant

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Emma, Consultant

17 May 2023

Day in the life series: Kirsty, Head of Programmes

18 May 2023

Day in the life series: Sully, Partnerships Associate/Consultant

19 May 2023

LLMs in Government: Brainstorming Applications

23 May 2023

Bahrain: Becoming a regional R&D Hub

30 May 2023

Driving AI adoption in the public sector: Uruguay’s efforts on capacity-building, trust, and AI ethics

12 June 2023

Response to the UK’s Global Summit on AI Safety

20 June 2023

 Unlocking the economic potential of AI: Tajikistan’s plans to become more AI-ready

11 July 2023

Government transparency and anti-corruption standards: Reflections from the EITI Global Conference in Dakar, Senegal

31 August 2023

What is quantum technology and why should policymakers care about it?

21 September 2023

Practical tools for designers in government looking to avoid ethical AI nightmares

23 October 2023

Collective Intelligence: exploring ‘wicked problems’ in National Security

23 October 2023

Exploring the concepts of digital twin, digital shadow, and digital model

30 October 2023

How to hire privileged white men

09 November 2023

Inclusive consensus building: Reflections from day 4 of AI Fringe

13 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Can AI help us improve our home’s energy efficiency?

14 November 2023

Navigating the AI summit boom: Initial reflections

20 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Improving home energy efficiency by retrofitting

24 November 2023

Will AI kill us all?

27 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Preventing and predicting wildfires 

28 November 2023

Service Design in Government 2023: conference reflections

04 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Using artificial and indigenous Intelligence to fight climate change

06 December 2023

Release: 2023 Government AI Readiness Index reveals which governments are most prepared to use AI

11 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: AI for flood adaptation plans and disaster relief

18 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Managing floods using AI Early Warning Systems

28 May 2024

Strengthening AI Governance in Chile: GobLab UAI and the Importance of Collaboration

05 June 2024

Towards a Digital Society: Trinidad and Tobago’s AI Ambitions