20 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Improving home energy efficiency by retrofitting

By Giulia Cirri

This blog is divided into two parts. If you’ve missed part one, don’t fret! You can find it here.

In the previous part of this blog, we looked at the state of the UK building stock, and just how important retrofitting homes is to reach net zero goals, but also for households’ health and wallets. When we think about AI in buildings, we most often think about smart buildings. I was curious to investigate other ways for AI to support improvements in energy efficiency, and in particular, to improve the physical building stock.


How can AI help?

The use of AI for retrofitting seems to be in the early stages of research. While there is definitely interest in the academic community, most studies are recent, and still in their initial phases. Nevertheless, there are some interesting studies using AI to support decision-makers.

A promising area for the use of AI relates to removing uncertainty from the retrofitting process. Indeed, experts note how retrofitting is marked by a high level of uncertainty and risk due to the complexity of the task, the lack of information on buildings, and competing interests (e.g. heritage-related concerns). This makes tools to support decision-making very useful. Two main ideas for the use of AI caught my attention:

1. Predicting retrofit effects through data-driven simulations

One thing AI is very good at doing is using large quantities of data to produce predictions: this makes AI very useful for climate adaptation in general, and this also applies to retrofitting. Usually, current tools to simulate the impact of retrofitting require intensive data input, high expertise, and long computation time. Moreover, retrofitting is often found to perform worse than expected, achieving lower energy efficiency than anticipated. One of the reasons for this underperformance is the large heterogeneity in the retrofit effects: a retrofit action might have different levels of effectiveness in different buildings. This heterogeneity is hard to capture through current simulation tools: while simulation tools allow full control of physical and environmental parameter settings, they also require a lot of data input, expertise, and computation time. To simplify the model, many tools use prototype buildings, speeding up the analysis and providing a quick screening of retrofit alternatives. Nevertheless, this leads to a loss in accuracy: the prototype building does not necessarily match the real, existing building that will be retrofitted. This mismatch often leads to the retrofit performing worse than expected. Moreover, most simulation-based tools do not adequately assess operational or behavioural changes or their impacts on energy efficiency, which further increases the mismatch between simulation and reality.

The authors of this 2022 study on commercial buildings propose a data-driven approach, based on AI, to solve this problem. They use data from the U.S. General Service Administration (GSA), a government agency providing office space, services, and goods to government agencies. Between 2010 and 2015, a series of retrofit actions were undertaken in buildings in the GSA portfolio. The study quantifies the retrofit effect of those actions and uses the information to provide decision support for future retrofits.

In short, the researchers quantify the retrofit effect of six groups of retrofit actions: for instance, improving the building’s roofs, facades, or windows, modifying the heating, cooling, and ventilation systems (HVAC), or installing a system of smart metres. In order to assess the precise impact of the retrofit actions, researchers also needed to identify what variables other than the retrofit actions could have had an impact on the building’s energy consumption – the confounding, or control, variables. For instance, these variables include building characteristics, such as size and age, energy use, and weather variables. Researchers then apply a machine learning method with causal forest to quantify the retrofit effect considering all the control variables. They also identify and rank the importance of the confounding variables.

The model can be reused to support decision-making: based on measured data on energy use and weather history, building characteristics, and other control variables. Portfolio owners and policymakers can train models that estimate energy savings for past retrofits, predict savings for future retrofits, and target buildings with high predicted savings. Moreover, since it is based on measured data, this approach has the potential to better reflect the savings actually achieved. It is also less computation and data-intensive, therefore making it easier to be applied to a whole portfolio of buildings.

2. Using AI to identify the best retrofitting strategies

As mentioned, in its current form, the retrofitting process is expensive in terms of time, effort, resources, and expertise, and it fails to deliver quick and objective solutions for massive datasets. Therefore, researchers in this second study aim to create a data-driven decision support system using AI to quickly support the choice of the best retrofitting strategy.

Researchers use AI (in particular, clustering) to process and group a massive database of building information in Lombardy, Italy. This first database, CENED, provides information on a building’s period, energy label – and therefore energy consumption – and the transmittance of walls, windows, and roofs, which provides an indication of how much heat is lost through each of these respectively. The researchers were able to link this data with another database, TABULA, containing the typical building materials used for each period and transmittance value. Through their analysis, the researchers can understand which materials correspond to higher energy efficiency for buildings of the same period – and therefore which retrofitting practices work better for buildings with particular characteristics.

In short, this study uses AI to process a massive amount of open data and energy retrofit decision-making systems. The model identifies a given building’s construction technology and materials based on its energy parameters and records in national databases, and determines which materials bring the most optimum retrofit strategy to obtain a particular (higher) energy-efficient label. According to the authors, the study provides a precise, reliable and quick assessment tool that can serve as a reference point for energy retrofit strategic decision-making and planning on a building or urban scale.

AI potential and data availability

While the field of AI for retrofitting is still emerging and requires further research and development, AI has the potential to support the building stocks’ net-zero objectives by supporting retrofitting practices.

However, the success of AI in this field, as in all the fields, really hinges on one thing: having enough data to work with. Experts highlight how building databases often lack the essential information needed to assess the viability of specific energy conservation measures. Moreover, these databases might vary differently across, and even within, countries: data availability might depend on local legislation, or even on the typology of buildings. In order for AI to be widely implemented in the area, it is fundamental that data is consistently available. The European Union is making important progress in harmonising databases across its member states – for instance the TABULA database used in the second study was created as part of an EU project.

As we head into winter, the issue of energy-efficient and well-insulated homes will once again be on our minds daily. While the will to implement retrofits is entirely human, AI might come to give us a nudge in the coming years.


More insights

21 April 2017

Why Government is ready for AI

12 July 2017

Five levels of AI in public service

26 July 2017

Making it personal: civil service and morality

10 August 2017

AI: Is a robot assistant going to steal your job?

19 September 2017

AI and legitimacy: government in the age of the machine

06 October 2017

More Than The Trees Are Worth? Intangibles, Decision-Making, and the Meares Island Logging Conflict

16 October 2017

The UK Government’s AI review: what’s missing?

23 October 2017

Why unconference? #Reimagine2017

03 November 2017

AI: the ultimate intern

09 November 2017

Motherboard knows best?

23 November 2017

Beyond driverless cars: our take on the UK’s Autumn Budget 2017

05 December 2017

Why Black people don’t start businesses (and how more inclusive innovation could make a difference)

06 December 2017

“The things that make me interesting cannot be digitised”: leadership lessons from the Drucker Forum

23 January 2018

Want to get serious about artificial intelligence? You’ll need an AI strategy

15 February 2018

Economic disruption and runaway AI: what can governments do?

26 April 2018

Ranking governments on AI – it’s time to act

08 May 2018

AI in the UK: are we ‘ready, willing and able’?

24 May 2018

Mexico leads Latin America as one of the first ten countries in the world to launch an artificial intelligence strategy

05 July 2018

Beyond borders: talking at TEDxLondon

13 July 2018

Is the UK ready, willing and able for AI? The Government responds to the Lords’ report

17 July 2018

Suspending or shaping the AI policy frontier: has Germany become part of the AI strategy fallacy?

27 July 2018

From open data to artificial intelligence: the next frontier in anti-corruption

01 August 2018

Why every city needs to take action on AI

09 August 2018

When good intentions go bad: the role of technology in terrorist content online

26 September 2018

Actions speak louder than words: the role of technology in combating terrorist content online

08 February 2019

More than STEM: how teaching human specialties will help prepare kids for AI

02 May 2019

Should we be scared of artificial intelligence?

04 June 2019

Ethics and AI: a crash course

25 July 2019

Dear Boris

01 August 2019

AI: more than human?

06 August 2019

Towards Synthetic Reality: When DeepFakes meet AR/VR

19 September 2019

Predictive Analytics, Public Services and Poverty

10 January 2020

To tackle regional inequality, AI strategies need to go local

20 April 2020

Workshops in an age of COVID and lockdown

10 September 2020

Will automation accelerate what coronavirus started?

10 September 2020

Promoting gender equality and social inclusion through public procurement

21 September 2020

The Social Dilemma: A failed attempt to land a punch on Big Tech

20 October 2020

Data and Power: AI and Development in the Global South

23 December 2020

The ‘Creepiness Test’: When should we worry that AI is making decisions for us?

13 June 2022

Data promises to support climate action. Is it a double-edged sword?

30 September 2022

Towards a human-centred vision for public services: Human-Centred Public Services Index

06 October 2022

Why You Should Know and Care About Algorithmic Transparency

26 October 2022

Harnessing data for the public good: What can governments do?

09 December 2022

Behind the scenes of the Government AI Readiness Index

06 February 2023

Reflections on the Intel® AI for Youth Program

01 May 2023

Canada’s AI Policy: Leading the way in ethics, innovation, and talent

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Giulia, Consultant

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Emma, Consultant

17 May 2023

Day in the life series: Kirsty, Head of Programmes

18 May 2023

Day in the life series: Sully, Partnerships Associate/Consultant

19 May 2023

LLMs in Government: Brainstorming Applications

23 May 2023

Bahrain: Becoming a regional R&D Hub

30 May 2023

Driving AI adoption in the public sector: Uruguay’s efforts on capacity-building, trust, and AI ethics

07 June 2023

Jordan’s AI policy journey: Bridging vision and implementation

12 June 2023

Response to the UK’s Global Summit on AI Safety

20 June 2023

 Unlocking the economic potential of AI: Tajikistan’s plans to become more AI-ready

11 July 2023

Government transparency and anti-corruption standards: Reflections from the EITI Global Conference in Dakar, Senegal

31 August 2023

What is quantum technology and why should policymakers care about it?

21 September 2023

Practical tools for designers in government looking to avoid ethical AI nightmares

23 October 2023

Collective Intelligence: exploring ‘wicked problems’ in National Security

23 October 2023

Exploring the concepts of digital twin, digital shadow, and digital model

30 October 2023

How to hire privileged white men

09 November 2023

Inclusive consensus building: Reflections from day 4 of AI Fringe

13 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Can AI help us improve our home’s energy efficiency?

14 November 2023

Navigating the AI summit boom: Initial reflections

24 November 2023

Will AI kill us all?

27 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Preventing and predicting wildfires 

28 November 2023

Service Design in Government 2023: conference reflections

04 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Using artificial and indigenous Intelligence to fight climate change

06 December 2023

Release: 2023 Government AI Readiness Index reveals which governments are most prepared to use AI

11 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: AI for flood adaptation plans and disaster relief

18 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Managing floods using AI Early Warning Systems