05 December 2017

Why Black people don’t start businesses (and how more inclusive innovation could make a difference)

by Isak Nti Asare

Our consultant Isak Nti Asare at the UK Civil Service's Unconference 2017, Reimagining Public Service, organised by OneTeamGov. Photo from oneteamgov flickr page.

Our consultant Isak Nti Asare at the UK Civil Service’s Unconference 2017, Reimagining Public Service, organised by OneTeamGov. Photo from oneteamgov flickr page.

 

When the UK Prime Minister launched the Race Disparity Audit in October 2017 she said “I absolutely, passionately believe that how far you go in life, should be about your talents and your hard work and nothing else” She went on to say that  “[…]when one person works just as hard as another person— and has got the same ambitions and aspirations—but experiences a worse outcome solely [on] the grounds of their ethnicity, then this is a problem that I believe we have to confront”. This is a nice sentiment, but the results of the audit didn’t tell us anything that we didn’t already know. Several reports and studies have already shown widespread societal discrimination that has created multiple layers of disadvantage across society—Black people being particularly affected. Thus, the real question is what is the government going to do about this problem? It is nice to collate all of the data, but collecting data that already existed is not the same as crafting policy to address—or to use the Prime Minister’s word’s— confront, the issue. A useful application for this data would be to explore how different areas of discrimination interact. In order for us to craft policy that improves outcomes, we need to understand this.

Take for example the question of why more black people don’t start businesses. According to the audit, in 2016, Black workers were the least likely to be self-employed at 11%. This compares to 16% of white workers. My hypothesis as a Black business owner myself is that a large number of black businesses are in low-barrier sectors such as care work or cleaning. I strongly suspect that the number of Black-run tech startups for example, would show a bleak picture for those overall ethnicity statistics. Why is that?

Studies suggest that the main reasons Black people do not start businesses are lack of access to finance, being without resources to provide community and advice, no mentoring models, and fear. Furthermore, racism has paralyzing effects on groups of people. It is human nature to avoid rejection. A would-be Black entrepreneur may not even approach a bank for funding, or a lawyer for advice, if they have reason to believe that they will be rejected or receive a lower level of service on the basis of the colour of their skin. In all of this, we see that the interaction of areas of discrimination result in yet another area of underrepresentation. Namely, the fact that minorities are often overlooked for promotion, are underrepresented in leadership roles, or are fewer in number in key positions such as solicitors or accountants, results in less diversity in self-employment. Add this to the underwhelming numbers of young Black people reading for degrees in areas of high growth such as technology, and you have a system that doesn’t seem likely to change anytime soon.

So what can be done? I am of course particularly interested in the tech sector  (more specifically in startups working with artificial intelligence) as tech is the fastest growing sector in the United Kingdom. The AI revolution has the opportunity to drastically reshape the economy adding upwards of £230 billion by 2030. Though many jobs will undoubtedly be lost to AI, we should focus on the millions of jobs that will be created. This is where incentivising Black involvement comes in. Inclusive innovation has the opportunity to disrupt systemic disadvantage. Therefore, I think our attention when it comes to Blacks in the UK economy should focus on increasing participation in AI tech start-ups. Organisations such as Colourintech and UK Black Tech are working towards this goal.

What is missing to me is an actual Black tech startup incubator where participants are given one-to-one attention, training in entrepreneurship, access to networks of support, investors, and most importantly connections with mentors. These are things that all startups need, but are more difficult to access for Black entrepreneurs. I am suggesting we adopt something along the lines of the successful work that Oxford Insights’ founders did with the Open Data Institute in Mexico in creating Labora, but focusing our efforts on Black entrepreneurs rather than startups using open data. The Government should also make generous business grants available to Black entrepreneurs in this sector. Some grants targeting Black and other minority ethnic groups already exist, but I would like to see these focused on sustained growth rather than launching/seed stage given what we know about the rate at which tech startups fail. We should also incentivise and prepare young black people to successfully take up studies in tech via financial support, bolstered after-school programmes and opportunities for internships.

The burgeoning AI industry presents us with an amazing opportunity to dramatically alter the face of the future workforce. This future workforce could be a vibrant, diverse community that is representational and inclusive. Think about how that will affect the rest of society. The UK is a world leader in tech innovation — why not lead in diversity and inclusion as well? This is a real possibility, if action is taken now.

Insights

More insights

21 April 2017

Why Government is ready for AI

12 July 2017

Five levels of AI in public service

26 July 2017

Making it personal: civil service and morality

10 August 2017

AI: Is a robot assistant going to steal your job?

19 September 2017

AI and legitimacy: government in the age of the machine

06 October 2017

More Than The Trees Are Worth? Intangibles, Decision-Making, and the Meares Island Logging Conflict

16 October 2017

The UK Government’s AI review: what’s missing?

23 October 2017

Why unconference? #Reimagine2017

03 November 2017

AI: the ultimate intern

09 November 2017

Motherboard knows best?

23 November 2017

Beyond driverless cars: our take on the UK’s Autumn Budget 2017

06 December 2017

“The things that make me interesting cannot be digitised”: leadership lessons from the Drucker Forum

23 January 2018

Want to get serious about artificial intelligence? You’ll need an AI strategy

15 February 2018

Economic disruption and runaway AI: what can governments do?

26 April 2018

Ranking governments on AI – it’s time to act

08 May 2018

AI in the UK: are we ‘ready, willing and able’?

24 May 2018

Mexico leads Latin America as one of the first ten countries in the world to launch an artificial intelligence strategy

05 July 2018

Beyond borders: talking at TEDxLondon

13 July 2018

Is the UK ready, willing and able for AI? The Government responds to the Lords’ report

17 July 2018

Suspending or shaping the AI policy frontier: has Germany become part of the AI strategy fallacy?

27 July 2018

From open data to artificial intelligence: the next frontier in anti-corruption

01 August 2018

Why every city needs to take action on AI

09 August 2018

When good intentions go bad: the role of technology in terrorist content online

26 September 2018

Actions speak louder than words: the role of technology in combating terrorist content online

08 February 2019

More than STEM: how teaching human specialties will help prepare kids for AI

02 May 2019

Should we be scared of artificial intelligence?

04 June 2019

Ethics and AI: a crash course

25 July 2019

Dear Boris

01 August 2019

AI: more than human?

06 August 2019

Towards Synthetic Reality: When DeepFakes meet AR/VR

19 September 2019

Predictive Analytics, Public Services and Poverty

10 January 2020

To tackle regional inequality, AI strategies need to go local

20 April 2020

Workshops in an age of COVID and lockdown

10 September 2020

Will automation accelerate what coronavirus started?

10 September 2020

Promoting gender equality and social inclusion through public procurement

21 September 2020

The Social Dilemma: A failed attempt to land a punch on Big Tech

20 October 2020

Data and Power: AI and Development in the Global South

23 December 2020

The ‘Creepiness Test’: When should we worry that AI is making decisions for us?

13 June 2022

Data promises to support climate action. Is it a double-edged sword?

30 September 2022

Towards a human-centred vision for public services: Human-Centred Public Services Index

06 October 2022

Why You Should Know and Care About Algorithmic Transparency

26 October 2022

Harnessing data for the public good: What can governments do?

09 December 2022

Behind the scenes of the Government AI Readiness Index

06 February 2023

Reflections on the Intel® AI for Youth Program

01 May 2023

Canada’s AI Policy: Leading the way in ethics, innovation, and talent

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Giulia, Consultant

15 May 2023

Day in the life series: Emma, Consultant

17 May 2023

Day in the life series: Kirsty, Head of Programmes

18 May 2023

Day in the life series: Sully, Partnerships Associate/Consultant

19 May 2023

LLMs in Government: Brainstorming Applications

23 May 2023

Bahrain: Becoming a regional R&D Hub

30 May 2023

Driving AI adoption in the public sector: Uruguay’s efforts on capacity-building, trust, and AI ethics

07 June 2023

Jordan’s AI policy journey: Bridging vision and implementation

12 June 2023

Response to the UK’s Global Summit on AI Safety

20 June 2023

 Unlocking the economic potential of AI: Tajikistan’s plans to become more AI-ready

11 July 2023

Government transparency and anti-corruption standards: Reflections from the EITI Global Conference in Dakar, Senegal

31 August 2023

What is quantum technology and why should policymakers care about it?

21 September 2023

Practical tools for designers in government looking to avoid ethical AI nightmares

23 October 2023

Collective Intelligence: exploring ‘wicked problems’ in National Security

23 October 2023

Exploring the concepts of digital twin, digital shadow, and digital model

30 October 2023

How to hire privileged white men

09 November 2023

Inclusive consensus building: Reflections from day 4 of AI Fringe

13 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Can AI help us improve our home’s energy efficiency?

14 November 2023

Navigating the AI summit boom: Initial reflections

20 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Improving home energy efficiency by retrofitting

24 November 2023

Will AI kill us all?

27 November 2023

AI for Climate Change: Preventing and predicting wildfires 

28 November 2023

Service Design in Government 2023: conference reflections

04 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Using artificial and indigenous Intelligence to fight climate change

06 December 2023

Release: 2023 Government AI Readiness Index reveals which governments are most prepared to use AI

11 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: AI for flood adaptation plans and disaster relief

18 December 2023

AI for Climate Change: Managing floods using AI Early Warning Systems

28 May 2024

Strengthening AI Governance in Chile: GobLab UAI and the Importance of Collaboration

05 June 2024

Towards a Digital Society: Trinidad and Tobago’s AI Ambitions

17 June 2024

General election 2024 manifestos: the AI, data and digital TLDR

26 June 2024

Building Egypt’s AI Future: Capacity-Building, Compute Infrastructure, and Domestic LLMs

16 July 2024

Beyond the hype: thoughts on digital, data, and AI and the first 100 days