Ministry of e-Government, Bulgaria

Finding where data spaces can work in Bulgaria

The challenge

Bulgaria committed to building nine data spaces over five years, as part of an EU-funded programme to bring its data governance into line with the European Strategy for Data. 

A data space lets government, business, researchers and civil society share data while each keeps control of how its data is used. Few Eastern European countries had built one. The Ministry of e-Government needed to know which sectors were ready, and which uses of data would justify the effort. The World Bank, advising the Ministry, asked Oxford Insights to lead this assessment.

Our approach

We started with the evidence from abroad. Working with data space specialists from Fraunhofer ISST, we reviewed how Germany, Austria, Finland, China and the Czech Republic had set up data spaces, and what had made them work.

We then built a framework to judge how ready a sector is for a data space, under three headings: the ecosystem of stakeholders, the supply of data, and the demand for it. We applied it to the nine sectors the government had chosen: agriculture, education, energy, environment, health, regional development, tourism, transport and water. In each sector, we interviewed ministries, businesses and civil society groups; surveyed public officials with the Bulgarian research firm ESTAT; held a roundtable in Sofia with industry, academia and civil society; and reviewed the data already published.

Alongside this, we tested two candidate pilots put forward by the government, in smart cities and in health. We judged each against four tests: a compelling use case, clear value, no legal or cultural barriers, and enough good data ready to flow.

Finally, we scored each candidate data space on its likely impact and on how ready it was to build. From this we recommended a balanced set of nine data spaces and prioritised four for early development.

Our impact

We recommended that Bulgaria’s first pilot focus on air quality and urban heat islands in its cities. We found tourism, transport, agriculture and environment ready for data spaces in the short term, with health, education and regional development to follow. Energy and water need groundwork first. The nine data spaces we recommended ranged from road safety and tourist flows to skills matching and climate adaptation.

Bulgaria has carried this work into national policy. The Ministry of e-Government’s draft Data Management Strategy 2026–2030, published for consultation in April 2026, names nine national data spaces in priority sectors including tourism, transport, environment, health, and education. 

We presented the assessment method with the World Bank at Global Data Spaces Connect in Vienna in November 2024, and the International Data Spaces Association asked to reuse the presentation. The framework can be applied by any government planning data spaces.

 

Grid image: Sofia seen from the National Palace of Culture, by Sami C (pixelsblue) on Flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsblue/23612559722/, licensed under CC BY 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/



-

Projects

More Projects

Oxford Insights

The geopolitics of data governance: Data governance regimes

Oxford Insights

Using AI, big data, and open data for anti-corruption

Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport

Understanding AI R&D commercialisation

Oxford Insights

Ensuring inclusive secondary education in an AI age

Oxford Insights

Understanding racial bias in natural language processing

Oxford Insights

Human-Centred Public Services Index 2022

Innovate UK

Measuring the UK’s immersive economy

Government Digital Service

Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in ICT Procurement: Discovery Report

Oxford Insights

An assessment framework for measuring government AI readiness

Open Contracting Partnership

Global procurement responses to Covid-19

Oxford Insights

Artificial intelligence and the new worlds of protest, revolution, and digital interventionism

Open Contracting Partnership

Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Public Procurement: Qualitative Framework

CAF Development Bank of Latin America

Benchmarking the GovTech maturity of Ibero-American cities

Open Data Institute

How can regulators, industry bodies, and professional bodies create trust in data?

Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones

Designing a data sharing pilot for the Colombian government

United Nations Development Programme

Building UNDP’s AI Readiness Assessment tool

Intel

Evaluation of the Intel® AI for Youth Program

Government Digital Service

Exploring service improvements for Tell Us Once

Oxford Insights

AI for Climate Change

Oxford Insights

Trustworthy AI Self Assessment

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Open Ownership

Evaluating beneficial ownership transparency programmes

Govtech 4 Impact World Congress

Ministry of Justice

Helping probation officers use data to make recall decisions

Movement to Work

Quantifying Movement to Work’s impact

CAF

Evaluating GovTech ecosystems across Ibero-America

Department for Work and Pensions

Understanding DWP’s data practices

Administrative Data Research UK

Measuring the benefits of administrative data linkage

Government of Kenya & United Nations Development Programme

Building AI capacity in the Kenyan public sector

Identifying risks in public contracts: Generative AI and the Company Analysis Tool

Ministry of Justice

Connecting people with bail accommodation to reduce pressure on prisons

Liverpool Civic Data Cooperative

Valuing the Liverpool Civic Data Cooperative’s data linkage work

Sport England

Getting the nation moving: How a Data & AI Lab transformed Sport England’s data culture

Department of Health and Social Care

DHSC Compass: Helping the NHS to buy better medtech

Ofgem

Comparing AI adoption across UK regulators

Open Contracting Partnership

Evaluating the OCP’s open contracting programme

Department of Health and Social Care

Designing a gambling-related harms prevention reporting platform for the DHSC