Department of Health and Social Care

DHSC Compass: Helping the NHS to buy better medtech

From November 2025 to March 2026, we worked with the MedTech Programme in the Department for Health and Social Care to design a new digital service to help NHS staff buy medical devices based on patient outcomes and system-wide benefits, rather than simply buying the cheapest option.

During a 14-week Alpha phase, we designed a platform that enables NHS users to access real-world evaluative evidence of medtech products submitted by their peers, and contribute their own.

The team passed Alpha assessment, with the panel describing the team as exemplary. Senior policy colleagues praised our ability to turn an idea of Compass into a concrete vision, and a plan for Beta. 

The challenge 

Initially, the vision was for Compass to only include ‘authoritative’ sources: a collection of ‘top tier’ expert reviews, from sources identified by DHSC. However, we knew little about specific information needs or Trust-to-Trust sharing at the beginning of Alpha.

Through 7 research rounds, we iterated the vision to focus on Trust-to-Trust learning, creating a directory of medtech products showing:

  • Who has procured them in the NHS;
  • What evidence they shared about them (e.g. trial evaluations, suppliers’ feedback);
  • How to contact the right people to hear their experience. 

Our approach

As part of a multidisciplinary agile development team, we:

  • Conducted user research with a wide range of NHS staff, including users with accessibility needs. We led team-wide analysis sessions to ensure everyone had a shared understanding of user pain points, including policy colleagues.
  • Established a robust performance framework linking success to user needs and long-term departmental goals. Defined clear KPIs, metrics, and data sources, and developed engagement paths to ensure the service collects the right data to measure success.
  • Designed the supplier-facing service model, establishing appropriate levels of access and agency, and designing a secure authentication flow to meet complex user and departmental security requirements.
  • Delivered a comprehensive Beta-phase handover, including a step-by-step guide and evaluation framework to help the policy team identify suitable procurements for the private Beta trial, and a strategy for immediate stakeholder engagement.

Our impact

The service passed the Alpha service assessment, with the team’s work defined as an “exemplar” of user centered service design.

We also raised engagement and awareness about Compass, engaging a variety of DHSC stakeholders through Show and Tells, cross-project meetings, an ad hoc Advisory Board, and several presentations to industry events. This will make sure that the Private Beta can start as early as possible, with industry, users, and key stakeholders ready and excited to take part in the pilots. 

 

 

Grid photo by JOSE PETRO on Unsplash

-

Projects

More Projects

Oxford Insights

The geopolitics of data governance: Data governance regimes

Oxford Insights

Using AI, big data, and open data for anti-corruption

Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport

Understanding AI R&D commercialisation

Oxford Insights

Ensuring inclusive secondary education in an AI age

Oxford Insights

Understanding racial bias in natural language processing

Oxford Insights

Human-Centred Public Services Index 2022

Innovate UK

Measuring the UK’s immersive economy

Government Digital Service

Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in ICT Procurement: Discovery Report

Oxford Insights

An assessment framework for measuring government AI readiness

Open Contracting Partnership

Global procurement responses to Covid-19

Oxford Insights

Artificial intelligence and the new worlds of protest, revolution, and digital interventionism

Open Contracting Partnership

Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Public Procurement: Qualitative Framework

CAF Development Bank of Latin America

Benchmarking the GovTech maturity of Ibero-American cities

Open Data Institute

How can regulators, industry bodies, and professional bodies create trust in data?

Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones

Designing a data sharing pilot for the Colombian government

United Nations Development Programme

Building UNDP’s AI Readiness Assessment tool

Intel

Evaluation of the Intel® AI for Youth Program

Government Digital Service

Exploring service improvements for Tell Us Once

Oxford Insights

AI for Climate Change

Oxford Insights

Trustworthy AI Self Assessment

Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Open Ownership

Evaluating beneficial ownership transparency programmes

Govtech 4 Impact World Congress

Ministry of Justice

Helping probation officers use data to make recall decisions

Movement to Work

Quantifying Movement to Work’s impact

CAF

Evaluating GovTech ecosystems across Ibero-America

Department for Work and Pensions

Understanding DWP’s data practices

Administrative Data Research UK

Measuring the benefits of administrative data linkage

Government of Kenya & United Nations Development Programme

Building AI capacity in the Kenyan public sector

Identifying risks in public contracts: Generative AI and the Company Analysis Tool

Ministry of Justice

Connecting people with bail accommodation to reduce pressure on prisons

Liverpool Civic Data Cooperative

Valuing the Liverpool Civic Data Cooperative’s data linkage work

Sport England

Getting the nation moving: How a Data & AI Lab transformed Sport England’s data culture

Ofgem

Comparing AI adoption across UK regulators

Open Contracting Partnership

Evaluating the OCP’s open contracting programme

Department of Health and Social Care

Designing a gambling-related harms prevention reporting platform for the DHSC