Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Open Ownership

Evaluating beneficial ownership transparency programmes

The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and Open Ownership collaborated to create the Opening Extractives programme, which works to open up data on the beneficial owners of extractives companies across 11 countries. Oxford Insights conducted a midterm evaluation of Opening Extractives, measuring the programme’s success against its own objectives and OECD DAC criteria. We found evidence that the programme is delivering value across multiple areas and provided recommendations on how the programme could enhance its impact moving forward. Many of our recommendations were accepted, helping to further the programme’s aim of ensuring that citizens of resource-rich countries realise the maximum benefit from natural resource wealth.

The challenge

Extractive industries such as oil, gas, and mining are particularly vulnerable to corruption due to the large amounts of revenue in the sector. Anonymously owned companies often serve as the vehicle for this corruption. Beneficial ownership transparency seeks to make information about who truly benefits from the wealth companies acquire publicly available.

The Opening Extractives programme works to collect and publish beneficial ownership data as well as build the capacity of governments and local stakeholders to analyse this data to improve accountability and governance.

EITI and Open Ownership wanted to know:

  • What are the impacts, progress, gaps, and lessons from the past 2.5 years of this programme (in line with OECD Development Assistance Committee evaluation criteria)?
  • How can Opening Extractives build upon these learnings to ensure maximum impact over the remainder of the programme?

Our approach

We measured the programme against its stated objectives and outcomes as well as the OECD DAC criteria of effectiveness, impact, relevance, coherence, sustainability, and efficiency.

We collected data via in-depth desk research and stakeholder interviews with Opening Extractives programme leaders, in-country staff, external consultants and partners, and programme funders in 7 countries the programme operates in.

Our impact

Our evaluation found that the Opening Extractives programme has made significant progress over its first 2.5 years of implementation. We found evidence that the programme is delivering value across multiple areas including awareness raising, building capacity across government, providing technical assistance, and facilitating peer exchanges.

We also identified particularly successful areas where the programme should double down on investment, and other areas that would benefit from course correction in the next phase of the programme. Our recommendations will contribute toward the programme’s overall goal of supporting beneficial ownership transparency. Ultimately, collecting and publishing beneficial ownership information publicly should lead to better governance in the extractive sector, meaning that less money is diverted away from the public services that all residents of a country deserve.

Midterm evaluation of the Opening Extractives programme - Public summary report

pdf - 326 KB

Projects

More Projects

Oxford Insights

The geopolitics of data governance: Data governance regimes

Oxford Insights

Using AI, big data, and open data for anti-corruption

Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport

Understanding AI R&D commercialisation

Oxford Insights

Ensuring inclusive secondary education in an AI age

Oxford Insights

Understanding racial bias in natural language processing

Oxford Insights

Human-Centred Public Services Index 2022

Innovate UK

Measuring the UK’s immersive economy

Government Digital Service

Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in ICT Procurement: Discovery Report

Oxford Insights

An assessment framework for measuring government AI readiness

Open Contracting Partnership

Global procurement responses to Covid-19

Oxford Insights

Artificial intelligence and the new worlds of protest, revolution, and digital interventionism

Open Contracting Partnership

Gender Equality and Social Inclusion in Public Procurement: Qualitative Framework

CAF Development Bank of Latin America

Benchmarking the GovTech maturity of Ibero-American cities

Open Data Institute

How can regulators, industry bodies, and professional bodies create trust in data?

Ministerio de Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones

Designing a data sharing pilot for the Colombian government

United Nations Development Programme

Building UNDP’s AI Readiness Assessment tool

Intel

Evaluation of the Intel® AI for Youth Program

Government Digital Service

Exploring service improvements for Tell Us Once

Oxford Insights

AI for Climate Change

Oxford Insights

Trustworthy AI Self Assessment

Govtech 4 Impact World Congress

Ministry of Justice

Helping probation officers use data to make recall decisions

Movement to Work

Quantifying Movement to Work’s impact

CAF

Evaluating GovTech ecosystems across Ibero-America

Department for Work and Pensions

Understanding DWP’s data practices

Administrative Data Research UK

Measuring the benefits of administrative data linkage

Government of Kenya & United Nations Development Programme

Building AI capacity in the Kenyan public sector

Identifying risks in public contracts: Generative AI and the Company Analysis Tool

Ministry of Justice

Connecting people with bail accommodation to reduce pressure on prisons

Liverpool Civic Data Cooperative

Valuing the Liverpool Civic Data Cooperative’s data linkage work

Sport England

Getting the nation moving: How a Data & AI Lab transformed Sport England’s data culture

Department of Health and Social Care

DHSC Compass: Helping the NHS to buy better medtech

Ofgem

Comparing AI adoption across UK regulators

Open Contracting Partnership

Evaluating the OCP’s open contracting programme

Department of Health and Social Care

Designing a gambling-related harms prevention reporting platform for the DHSC